Journal of Management
This large prospective meta-analysis investigates gender differences in authorship experiences across multiple countries and samples. Results reveal that women report higher rates of problematic authorship practices than men, highlighting systemic inequities in the recognition of scholarly contributions. The article offers seven recommendations to improve fairness and transparency in authorship.
Management Teaching Review
This article presents interactive, experiential assignments designed to teach entrepreneurship concepts. Examples include innovation challenges, personal branding projects, and group activities that simulate real-world entrepreneurial problem-solving. The exercises aim to increase student engagement while building entrepreneurial mindsets and skills.
Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Perspectives on Science and Practice
This article critiques common sampling practices in organizational research and highlights overlooked issues in sample misrepresentation. It argues that changes in work trends and temporal shifts must be considered when assessing generalizability. The piece broadens the discussion of sampling beyond traditional concerns of convenience or representativeness.
Journal of Business Research
This article examines employee perceptions of workplace meetings across 41 countries. Results show that many meetings are perceived as ineffective, often due to poor design and lack of relevance to participants. The study provides evidence-based recommendations for improving meeting design, structure, and leader facilitation.
Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Perspectives on Science and Practice
This article critiques the growing use of Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) for organizational research, highlighting both its promise and its limitations. It reviews evidence on representativeness, data quality, and potential biases, urging caution when relying on convenience samples for scientific conclusions. The discussion emphasizes the need for stronger methodological safeguards when adopting online participant pools.
Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Perspectives on Science and Practice
This commentary examines the role of corrigenda and retractions as mechanisms of scientific self-correction. It argues that while mistakes are inevitable in research, transparent corrections are essential to maintaining trust in the field. The piece calls for a cultural shift that normalizes correction as part of robust science.
The Learning Organization
This article introduces joint-variance synthesis as a new way to model exploration–exploitation relationships in organizational ambidexterity research. The approach reduces confounds and better captures the reciprocal dynamics theorized between exploration and exploitation. Findings provide stronger empirical alignment with theory and new insights for organizational performance.
Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Perspectives on Science and Practice
This commentary argues that publishing in high-prestige journals does not guarantee research quality. It highlights how pressures to publish in “top” outlets may incentivize questionable research practices and undermine rigor. The piece urges scholars and institutions to rethink how quality and impact are assessed in academia.
Military Psychology
This study investigates how transformational leadership and psychological capital influence stress and well-being in combat environments. Findings show that leadership’s buffering effects on stress grow stronger as risk levels increase, with psychological resources providing additional resilience. The work expands leadership theory by examining boundary conditions in extreme contexts.
Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Perspectives on Science and Practice
This commentary explores the emerging concept of antiwork from two perspectives: as a philosophical critique of work and as a measurable attitude or construct. It argues that recognizing antiwork as an attitudinal dimension could generate new insights into workforce motivation and disengagement. The piece calls for research that operationalizes antiwork to expand organizational theory.